Stryker may announce a new hip implant recall concerning select LFit V40 femoral heads in the very near future due to higher than expected complaints of taper lock failures. These soon to be recalled Stryker hip implant femoral heads are known to be utilized on both Accolade TMZF and Accolade 2 stems as well as Meridian and Citation stems. Dangers from these failures include: Disassociation of femoral head from hip stem, Fractured hip stem trunnion, Excessive metallic debris and numerous other complications.
In addition to the LFit V40 failures, the medical device company Stryker is facing thousands of lawsuits from people who have suffered complications from the company’s Rejuvenate and ABG II hip implants. If you or a loved one has been harmed by one of these recalled hip implants, you should join these people with the help of a defective device lawyer to seek the compensation you deserve to ensure the best recovery from this painful ordeal. To get started on your case, call an Atlanta stryker hip implants lawyer today.
The attorneys at Hammers Law Firm have been at the forefront of this nationwide litigation, helping negotiate settlements on behalf of injured Americans. We know defective hip lawsuit cases inside and out. That’s why you should give us a call today if you or a loved one has suffered due to a defective ABG II or Rejuvenate hip replacement.
Time is extremely limited to participate in this litigation, so don’t delay. There is no cost or obligation on your part to speak with us.
Stryker recalled its Rejuvenate and ABG II modular-neck hip stems in June 2012. The recall came after the devices were linked to high failure rates and corrosion of the joint’s metal components, which can damage surrounding tissue. Many people with one of these two types of hip implants have had to undergo revision surgery to fix these problems.
The pain associated with a problematic hip replacement can be agonizing. Reports on file with the Food and Drug Administration tell of patients unable to walk and suffering other complications.
Complications associated with Stryker’s recalled ABG II and Rejuvenate hip systems include:
None of the plaintiffs in Stryker hip implant lawsuits wanted to end up in this situation. All you and other hip victims wanted was a hip replacement that did its job.
The complications these recalled Stryker hips have caused are more than just painful. They also place a huge physical, emotional and financial burden on patients and their families. Addressing these hip complications often requires subjecting the patient to a revision surgery – an expensive procedure with a lengthy recovery period.
If you are the victim of a defective hip, you don’t deserve this.
Nothing will take back the pain that this ordeal caused. However, taking legal action may be able to get you the resources you need to ensure that the suffering stops right here. The future can be brighter.
In October 2013, the Wall Street Journal said that Stryker estimated spending as much as $1.13 billion to resolve the lawsuits that stem from the recall of these two products.
Metal-on-metal hip implants were originally marketed as an alternative to orthopedic implants coated with plastic or ceramic. Based on laboratory testing, the all-metal implants were shown to be more resistant to wear and to reduce the risk of dislocation. For a decade, surgeons favored metal-on-metal implants.
Yet it now appears that the devices are prone to early failure. Medical researchers have voiced concern over the years about the safety of metal-on-metal hip devices due to effects of metal components rubbing against each other. That’s why some hip systems by Stryker and other manufacturers have been recalled.
Patients who are at higher risk include, but are not limited to:
Stryker released its Rejuvenate and ABG II in 2009, but recalled the devices three years later in July 2012. Stryker’s metal-on-metal hip implant began to show evidence of corrosion after devices were implanted.
It has been alleged that the ABG II and Rejuvenate hip systems were not sufficiently scrutinized before being approved for the market. That’s because they were approved under a provision known as 501(k), which allowed the hip implants to be approved without a vigorous demonstration of their safety because they are similar in design to another product already approved.
Critics are calling on the FDA to close this “loophole.”